crime+scene+scriped

media type="custom" key="4746165"​ 

My name is Detective Dominique. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a beach house at aruond 10 10:00 -10:15 am. The alleged victim was Kenda ( This is the person the crime was committed against. Was she murdered?). The suspect guilty of committing this crime is because it just seem that their was a note,some fingerprints and DNA test all point to Kendra. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.The most incriminating piece of evidence was the note. The evidence was found in area 8. The test performed was to find if the hand writing on the note was vera's or someone else. The results of the test said that the Dear martha, im glade it's over felix is alive love vera. This connects the suspect to the crime because we found ot that the hand writing was not vera's it was kendra's .(Why would she sign Vera's name?)

The next piece of evidence collected was the fingerprint on the cup. It was found in area 3. The test performed was the Fingerprint. The results of the test were Alfredo and felixs cup. On Alfredo's cup we found his fingerprints.On felix's cup we found kendra's fingerprint's. This connects the suspect to the crime because we found that felix's cup was found base.That means kendra had time to put something in his cup.

Another piece of evidence collected was the ice cube . It was found in area 7. The test performed was ph. The results of the test was the ice in the ice tray was base .This connects the suspect to the crime because kendra would now that felix would put ice in his cup .(How would she know that? What is the Ph of regular water and how does it compare to the water in the ice tray?)

The last piece of evidence collected the cola test .It was found nere the body. The test performed was Ph.The results of the test was that the regular cola was asid ,felix's was base and alfredo was asid.This connects the suspect to the crime because some one but somthing in his cup (How do you know? What is the Ph of regular cola?) According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day (This was supposed to be a step-by-step account of how she committed the crime.). Kendra wanted to kill felix's to get the money from the will and make sere no one else get some money.Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of atemmding merder of felix to get the money from the will.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__ Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. __** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 72% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __** The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || __** Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  **__ || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || ** __There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant.__ ** ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || __** Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  **__ || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__ Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  __** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 41/57